★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4.9 Client Rated
TRUSTED BY THE WORLD’S MOST ICONIC COMPANIES.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4.9 Client Rated
You get the biggest wins from serverless when the architecture is right before a single function gets written. Our senior cloud architects join your planning process to evaluate whether serverless fits your workload, and where it doesn't. You receive a function decomposition strategy, event-driven communication patterns between services, and a clear selection of managed services from AWS, Azure, or GCP to handle state, storage, queuing, and orchestration. Your team walks away with a documented architecture you can execute against with confidence, so your serverless project starts on solid ground instead of guesswork.
AWS Lambda is the most widely adopted serverless compute platform in enterprise deployments, and you get more value from it when your team goes beyond a basic function handler. We handle the full spectrum of production-grade Lambda engineering for you: function scope and single-responsibility boundaries, cold start mitigation through provisioned concurrency and runtime optimization, least-privilege IAM permissions, VPC configuration, and dead letter queue setup for reliable failure handling. Deployment automation runs through AWS SAM, CDK, or Serverless Framework. You end up with Lambda-based backends and data pipelines that perform reliably and cost-efficiently at any scale.
When you build APIs on serverless infrastructure, combining AWS API Gateway or Azure API Management with Lambda or Azure Functions, you get auto-scaling and zero idle cost while exposing clean, versioned interfaces to your clients and internal teams. Our serverless API development covers REST and GraphQL design, request validation and transformation, authentication through JWT, OAuth 2.0, Cognito, and custom authorizers, plus rate limiting, CORS handling, and versioning strategy. You get APIs that stay performant under load, secure by design, and easy to maintain as your integration surface grows over time.
Event-driven design is what makes serverless powerful enough for enterprise-scale workloads: services communicate through events rather than direct calls, decoupled by queues and event buses so each component scales, fails, and evolves independently. We design and build your event-driven architecture using AWS EventBridge, SQS, SNS, Kinesis, and Azure Service Bus, creating pipelines for real-time processing, asynchronous workflows, and fan-out patterns that would be costly on conventional servers. You get guaranteed delivery, idempotent processing, and structured logging and tracing that keep operations visible, so you know where a message sits in your pipeline and why a step failed.
Moving your workloads from conventional servers or containers to serverless isn't a lift-and-shift job. It requires rethinking how your application is decomposed, how state is managed, and how services talk to each other. We assess your existing portfolio, identify the workloads where serverless refactoring delivers the highest return in cost, simplicity, or scalability, and migrate in phases that keep your production systems running while the new version is built and validated. You also get the infrastructure-as-code transition, replacing manually provisioned resources with reproducible, version-controlled serverless deployments that are fundamentally easier for your team to operate and scale going forward.
Serverless architecture fits data workloads with variable or unpredictable volume especially well. The pay-per-execution model turns idle infrastructure cost into zero cost during quiet periods, and auto-scaling absorbs volume spikes without manual work on your end. We build your serverless data pipelines for ETL and ELT workflows, real-time stream processing with Kinesis and Lambda or Event Hubs and Functions, batch transformation triggered by S3 events, and webhook ingestion from external sources. Your pipelines integrate cleanly with downstream warehouses on Snowflake, Redshift, BigQuery, and Delta Lake, giving your analytics teams reliable, up-to-date data without you managing servers in between.
Complex multi-step processes like order fulfillment, document pipelines, approval chains, and data enrichment sequences need orchestration that handles retries, manages state across steps, and gives you visibility into what's running. We build your workflow orchestration using AWS Step Functions and Azure Durable Functions, designing state machines that express your business logic explicitly and handle partial failures gracefully. You get the audit trail and monitoring your compliance and operations teams need. Compared to orchestration logic buried inside individual functions, this approach reduces error handling and timeout complexity, giving your team a clear view of every workflow instance without custom tracking infrastructure.
The shared responsibility model shifts infrastructure security to your cloud provider, but application-layer security still sits with your team: IAM design, secrets management, encryption, input validation, and dependency security. We target the specific attack surface of serverless applications, including over-permissioned execution roles, hardcoded secrets in environment variables, injection vulnerabilities in event-triggered functions, and unprotected function URLs. You get IAM policies built with least-privilege precision, secure secrets management through AWS Secrets Manager, WAF rules for your API endpoints, and a function-level security review in every engagement, so vulnerabilities get caught before they reach your production environment.
Paying only for what you use sounds simple, but it doesn't guarantee a low bill. Poorly configured serverless applications rack up costs through memory over-provisioning, inefficient invocation patterns, unnecessary data transfer, and unoptimized function durations. We analyze your existing workloads, profiling execution patterns, memory allocation efficiency, invocation frequency, and cross-service data flows, then implement targeted fixes that cut your serverless spend without touching performance or reliability. For new projects, we design cost-aware architectures from day one, with billing visibility and alerting so surprises never hit your invoice at the end of the month.
Debugging serverless applications takes a different observability approach than conventional systems, because the ephemeral, distributed nature of function execution leaves traditional monitoring tools with incomplete visibility. We build your observability stack using AWS CloudWatch with structured logging, X-Ray for distributed tracing across function chains, custom dashboards for business-level KPIs, and alerting that catches cold start degradation, error spikes, and cost anomalies before they become incidents. Once you're live, our ongoing support retainers cover runtime updates, dependency patching, and performance tuning, keeping your infrastructure secure and cost-efficient over its entire operational lifetime.
Manual deployment is the fastest way to undermine everything serverless gives you. We build CI/CD pipelines using GitHub Actions, AWS CodePipeline, or equivalent tooling that automate build, test, infrastructure provisioning, and deployment for every function and API in your application. You get staged rollout configurations, including canary and blue-green deployments, for releases where zero downtime matters. All infrastructure runs through AWS SAM, CDK, Serverless Framework, or Terraform, so every environment is reproducible and every change is auditable. Your team ships faster without sacrificing release confidence or production stability, even as your function count grows.
If your organization has existing multi-cloud commitments, data residency requirements, or vendor risk policies, a single-cloud serverless deployment won't work for you. We design multi-cloud and hybrid serverless architectures with deliberate abstraction layers, using tools like Serverless Framework, Terraform, and Pulumi to keep your infrastructure portable across AWS, Azure, and GCP. You get consistent deployment patterns, unified observability across providers, and a migration path that doesn't lock you into any single vendor's ecosystem. Your team gains the flexibility to run workloads wherever they perform and cost best, without rebuilding your architecture every time your cloud strategy shifts.
Coca-Cola required an advanced solution to accurately forecast the demand for its products, enabling them to optimize inventory and efficiently plan resources. The main need was to implement a predictive system that could analyze complex patterns, seasonality, and trends to improve their supply chain and operations.
Coca-Cola needed a predictive tool to anticipate customer churn and manage the risk of abandonment. The goal was to implement an early warning system to identify risk factors and proactively reduce churn rates, optimizing retention costs and maximizing customer lifetime value.
Coca-Cola sought an intelligent customer segmentation system that could identify and analyze behavioral patterns across different market segments. The solution had to automatically adapt to new data, allowing for optimized marketing strategies and improved return on investment.
Coca-Cola needed a solution to measure sentiment in comments, categorize themes, generate automated responses, and provide detailed reports by department. This approach would transform feedback data into a growth tool, promoting loyalty and continuous improvements in the business.
Coca-Cola faced the challenge of accelerating and optimizing the creation of marketing promotions for its various products and campaigns. Coca-Cola was looking for a solution to improve efficiency, reduce design and copywriting time, and ensure consistency in brand voice. Additionally, the company sought a flexible, customizable platform that would allow the creation of high-quality content while maintaining consistency across campaigns.
Banco Patagonia recognized the need to transform its customer support infrastructure to meet the evolving expectations of its customers. They wanted a seamless solution to integrate the PADI chatbot across multiple platforms and channels, ensuring a consistent and practical user experience. To address this, they aimed to develop a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) featuring three key components: a human chat interface, a hybrid chat system, and an intelligent chatbot.
Oanda faced a critical need to enhance their Forex Trade application, requiring specialized Java development resources with expertise in Java Swing to drive forward both ongoing development and essential maintenance. Oanda sought a partner who could seamlessly blend technical prowess with a deep understanding of regulatory compliance and agile methodologies.
Openpay needed a substantial upgrade to its payment processing capabilities, particularly focusing on mobile applications. The aim was to integrate advanced technologies for secure credit card transactions and to enhance core business functionalities. The project demanded extensive technical expertise to support mobile payment initiatives and refine essential system processes.
Swiss Medical Group set out to revolutionize their affiliate app by integrating agile development and advanced technology. The aim was to modernize the app, address outdated systems, and create a unified, intuitive experience across all devices. This project sought to enhance design, boost performance, and streamline operations to deliver a seamless user experience.
The biggest benefit of serverless extends well beyond the compute layer. Yes, you stop provisioning and managing servers, but the deeper value is the operational shift it enables. Your engineering team stops spending time on infrastructure maintenance, capacity planning, and patching, and redirects that time toward business logic and product features. You also inherit the cloud provider's reliability engineering for scaling and availability, work you would otherwise build and maintain yourself. When you evaluate serverless, weigh the operational time you get back alongside the direct cost comparison, because that time savings often outweighs the compute bill itself.
How you decompose business logic into individual functions affects the maintainability, testability, debuggability, and cost efficiency of your serverless application more than any other design decision you'll make. Functions that are too coarse bundle unrelated logic together, making them hard to test, deploy independently, or reason about in isolation. Functions that are too granular create excessive inter-function communication overhead and operational complexity. You want function boundaries that map to single, well-defined responsibilities within your domain. Getting this decision right early saves you from expensive refactoring once your application scales past its initial design.
Cold start latency, the extra initialization time when a function runs for the first time or after a period of inactivity, gets dismissed too often in architecture discussions and shows up too often in production incidents. If your application serves latency-sensitive traffic, you need a concrete mitigation strategy: provisioned concurrency for critical paths, runtime and package size optimization, and careful language selection, since cold start behavior varies significantly across runtimes. You should measure cold start impact under realistic traffic patterns before launch, not after users notice the delay. Ignoring this concern early costs you credibility with users later.
A common misconception is that stateless execution simplifies application state management. In reality, serverless relocates state rather than eliminating it, moving it from in-memory application state to external managed services like DynamoDB, Redis, or Step Functions. You still need to design your state model carefully, deciding what belongs in a database versus a cache versus a workflow state machine. Skipping this design work leads to inconsistent state, race conditions across concurrent invocations, and debugging sessions that take far longer than they should. Treat state management as a first-class design decision, not an afterthought you solve during implementation.
A serverless application with dozens or hundreds of functions, event sources, IAM roles, API configurations, and managed service integrations becomes unmanageable at production scale without infrastructure as code. Manual configuration through cloud consoles doesn't give you reproducibility, version history, or a reliable way to replicate environments for testing and staging. You need tooling like AWS CDK, SAM, Serverless Framework, or Terraform from the start of your project, not bolted on after your first production incident. This investment pays off directly in deployment consistency, faster onboarding for new engineers, and confidence that every environment matches what you expect.
Most serverless guidance assumes a single-cloud deployment target, and for many applications that assumption holds. But if your organization has existing multi-cloud commitments, data residency requirements across regions, or vendor risk policies that limit dependence on one provider, you need deliberate abstraction layers built into your architecture from day one. This means designing around provider-agnostic tooling and interfaces rather than deeply coupling your business logic to provider-specific services. The abstraction adds engineering overhead, so you should only take this path when a real business requirement demands it, not as a default architectural choice.
One persistent false choice in cloud architecture is framing serverless versus containers as approaches where you must pick one. In practice, the best-designed enterprise architectures use both, with serverless handling event-driven, variable-load workloads and containers handling long-running processes, stateful services, or workloads with predictable, sustained traffic. You get the most value when you match each workload to the execution model it fits best rather than forcing everything into a single paradigm. Your architecture decisions should follow the workload characteristics, not a company-wide mandate to standardize on one compute model across every team.
Identity and access management configuration is where the most consequential and most commonly neglected security decisions in serverless live. Every function has an execution role defining what resources and actions it can access, and over-permissioned roles are the most common security gap in enterprise serverless deployments. You need least-privilege IAM policies scoped to exactly what each function requires, regular audits of unused permissions, and secrets management through dedicated services rather than environment variables. Proactive IAM discipline costs you time upfront but prevents the kind of lateral movement that turns a single compromised function into a full breach.
Monitoring approaches built for long-lived server processes, like CPU and memory dashboards or uptime monitoring, give you inadequate visibility into serverless applications. A function that succeeds 99.9% of the time and fails intermittently under specific conditions can hide behind aggregate metrics that look healthy. You need structured logging tied to individual invocations, distributed tracing across function chains and downstream calls, and business-level metrics that reflect actual outcomes, not just infrastructure health. Building this observability layer before you scale saves you from debugging production issues with no visibility into what actually happened.
Serverless applications that lean heavily on provider-native services are harder to migrate to another provider than containerized applications, and that tradeoff is real. But it's a manageable risk, not a reason to avoid serverless altogether. You can isolate business logic from provider-specific SDKs behind clean interfaces, use infrastructure-as-code tools that support multiple providers, and document the provider-specific services your architecture depends on. This gives you a realistic migration path if your strategy changes later, without slowing down your current development. Weigh lock-in risk against the speed and cost benefits you get from embracing native managed services fully.
Choosing serverless doesn't automatically produce a low bill. Your actual costs depend heavily on memory allocation choices, invocation frequency, function duration, and how much data moves between services. Two teams building functionally identical applications can end up with dramatically different monthly costs based purely on configuration discipline. You should profile memory and duration settings against real workload patterns rather than accepting defaults, monitor invocation patterns for inefficiencies like excessive chaining, and set up billing alerts before you scale. Cost optimization is an ongoing practice, not a one-time setup task you finish and forget.
Traditional testing pyramids assume a long-running application you can spin up locally in its entirety. Serverless applications are distributed across functions, managed services, and event sources, which makes that assumption break down. You need unit tests for individual function logic with mocked event inputs, integration tests that run against real cloud resources in isolated environments, and end-to-end tests against staging environments that mirror production. Skipping integration testing in favor of unit tests alone leaves you blind to the failure modes that actually occur in production, since most serverless bugs happen at the boundaries between services, not inside individual functions.
Smooth. Swift. Simple.
We are eager to learn about your business objectives, understand your tech requirements, and specific Serverless Development needs.
We can assemble your team of experienced, timezone-aligned, expert Serverless Development developers within 7 days.
Our [tech] developers can quickly onboard, integrate with your team, and add value from the first moment.
Lambda is where most enterprise serverless work actually lives, and the distance between a demo and a production system shows up in the details. Our engineers set single responsibility boundaries for each function, cut cold starts through provisioned concurrency, lighter runtimes, and trimmed dependency bundles, and scope execution roles to least privilege instead of broad wildcards. They configure VPC access, dead letter queues, and retry policies so failures surface rather than disappear. Deployments run through AWS SAM or CDK, giving your team repeatable releases instead of console edits.
When your organization is standardized on Microsoft, serverless belongs inside Azure rather than beside it. Our developers build Azure Functions with the triggers and bindings that connect Service Bus, Event Grid, Blob Storage, and Cosmos DB without custom plumbing, then use Durable Functions to express long running approval chains, fan out processing, and human in the loop steps as readable code instead of scattered state. Identity runs through Entra ID and managed identities, secrets through Key Vault, and monitoring through Application Insights, so governance matches what your platform team already enforces.
Serverless applications split into dozens of small functions that only communicate through events, so one mistyped payload field can fail silently in production. TypeScript closes that gap. Our developers define shared types for every event, queue message, and API response, generate them from OpenAPI or JSON Schema where a contract already exists, and validate at the boundary with Zod. Type checking catches mismatches before deployment, and the same definitions drive infrastructure code in CDK. Your team changes a payload shape once, and the compiler points to every function that needs updating.
A serverless application is mostly managed services: functions, queues, event buses, tables, API gateways, and the permissions that connect them. Terraform makes that estate reproducible. Our engineers write modules that stand up a full environment from a single definition, keep development, staging, and production consistent, and use remote state with locking so parallel changes never collide. Plan output gives your reviewers an exact diff before anything is applied, and policy checks catch over permissive roles at merge time. If your footprint spans AWS and Azure, one toolchain covers both.
Once your backend becomes a set of independent functions and data stores, clients end up making many round trips to assemble one screen. GraphQL removes that problem by exposing a single typed schema over the whole estate. Our developers build it on AWS AppSync or Lambda backed resolvers, mapping each field to the function, DynamoDB table, or downstream service that owns it. Subscriptions push live updates over WebSockets without you running socket servers. Field level authorization, query depth limits, and caching keep the API safe and fast as the schema grows.
Some logic should never travel to a regional function. CloudFront runs it at the edge, milliseconds away from your users. Our engineers deploy CloudFront Functions for header rewrites, redirects, and token checks, and Lambda@Edge for heavier work such as personalization, A/B routing, and image transformation on request. Static assets and single page applications are served from S3 behind the distribution with cache policies tuned per route, while origin shield protects your backend during traffic spikes. You get lower global latency and fewer invocations billed against your regional functions.
Whether you’re looking to leverage the latest technologies, improve your infrastructure, or build high-performance applications, our team is here to guide you.
Accelerate your software development with our on-demand nearshore engineering teams.
